Offer books to readers everywhere – simply and on your own terms.
Why Risk Tiers Are the Rule That Does the Work
A simple three-tier model stops governance from becoming emotional. You are not deciding whether you like a tool. You are classifying impact and selecting safeguards accordingly. Risk tier determines the required safeguards, approvals, and documentation for every AI tool and use case in your district.
When in doubt, default to the higher tier.
LOW RISK — Allowed with Standard Controls
Definition: Internal drafts; no student identifiers; no student-facing output without human review.
Examples: Internal emails and agendas, lesson draft ideas (non-specific), rubric and feedback templates, public document summaries, general translations.
Required controls:
MODERATE RISK — Human Review Required + Documentation
Definition: Student-facing materials; district communications; instructional content that shapes student outcomes or public perception.
Examples: Family newsletters, student feedback language, website content, instructional materials.
Required controls:
HIGH RISK — AI Review Team Approval + Full Safeguards
Definition: Tools or use cases that process education records or sensitive student information; influence interventions, placement, discipline, or services; include predictive scoring or surveillance-like capabilities.
Examples: SPED documentation support, discipline or placement decision tools, predictive dashboards, counseling record tools.
Default to High when any of these are true:
Required controls:
High risk does not always mean never. It means formal review, documented safeguards, restricted use, and named accountability — before anything scales.